Fsbuild-2 Flight Planner

I am not getting that choice in the weather menu - only Active Sky 4. Here is the export directory I have for Active Sky 6:

F:\FLIGHT SIMULATOR 9\MODULES\ASV6

Now - if I go into the config & type
WEATHERPROG=ACTIVESKY20004-V

then there are NO choices once again in the weather menu with the drop down arrow. However, somehow when I leave it set for Activesky 4, the winds keep shpwing up in the last comumn - even if I have not launched Active sky beforehand.

Two questions - why ARE the winds showing up in the waypoints table- is this actually working?

And - given the path I described above, why can I not ge the choce for the weather program Activesky2004-V?

Once again - here is my config file that seems to be getting me winds aloft data:


[FSBUILD]
AUTOREFRESH_DELAY=1
MAGYEAR=2002
AIRCRAFT=B737-700 w/ CFM56-7B24
SBPC_SERVER=www.vatsim.net
ROUTELINE=1
NATRAKURL=www.natroutes.glideslope.de/html/nats.php3
WEATHERPROG=ACTIVESKY2004


[MS-FLIGHTSIMULATOR]
FS_HOME=F:\FLIGHT SIMULATOR 9
AS2004=F:\FLIGHT SIMULATOR 9\MODULES\ASV6

[FLY!]

[PS1]

[X-PLANE]

[STARTUP]
CLEARMAP_BEFORE_BUILD
DISPRTEWPTSONMAP
WINDS_ALOFT
AUTOREFRESH_ON


If I change the line to WEATHERPROG=ACTIVESKY2004-V, then when I re-launch FSB, no choices show up - so I have to manually select the export directory again as "ACTIVE SKY 2004:
F:\FLIGHT SIMULATOR 9\MODULES\ASV6

I save the config in the options menu. But then, I return to the config file only to find that the config file is once again altered to be
WEATHERPROG=Activesky2004.

Still a little confused.

Chris Catalano

_________________
Ron Ginsberg
Minnesota - Land of 10,000 Puddles

WOW! This keeps getting more & more awesome by the minute!!!!

So let me get this straight - if I have 5 waypoints each of different lengths and each with a different wind condition, FSB can actually even account for the fact that one leg may be 10 miles, and another may be 150 miles long, and it will give more "weight" in computing the average to the leg that is 150 NAM in length? (as opposed to just taking the 5 waypoints, adding them up and dividing by 5, in essence treating them all "equally")? Yes?

Chris